One of the key elements of transcendentalism is the idea of progressing forward. However, their views on progress contrast each other. Thoreau wants to go back to a "natural state", which can be seen in his book "Walden". Walden tells of Thoreau's time in a cabin he built and stayed in for two years near Walden Pond. The main message of Walden is that of the utopia of one is the "American Experience". This idea states that man is happiest when he is self-reliant. American Scholar contrasts this, by saying that it is through science and progress mankind can better itself, thus providing the "American Experience". These ideas both differ from Crevecour's idea of the "American Experience" in several ways. First, both Emerson and Thoreau believe that the political parties harmed Americans more than it helped them. They believe that political parties corrupt and harm individuals, and the only escape is to create ties to nature or to progress through bettering the individual through knowledge. Crevecouer assumed that the individual would be pure, and that democracy would be incorruptible.
Overall I agree more with Emerson's idea of progress through self improvement. Throughout history we can see that with education and self improvement, society itself improves. Albert Einstein and Thomas Edison are two examples of the idea of "individual potential". Albert Einstein, regarded as the smartest man to have ever lived, taught himself calculus at the age of 12. He later went on to be a world renowned physicist and developed the Theory of Relativity. Thomas Edison, inventor of the lightbulb, grew up teaching himself as well. Without his invention of the lightbulb, many inventions of today would not be possible, and life would be unimaginable. I prefer the idea of self-improvement and potential rather than reverting back to a simpler state because of all the potential boons the future holds. If we went back to a simpler time, we would lose all the potential improvements for our society.
Where does Emerson assert that progress through science is the best progress? Can you support this b/c I am not sure this is his primary point?
ReplyDelete